For an ideal 18 months in the early 1960s, 13 Boston-area women were strangled and sexually assaulted. An elusive murderer has left behind a bizarre criminal scene. as if mocking the people who would meet him The corpse was left in a suggestive position. Nylon stockings or other personal clothing were tied around their necks. Some had bottles, brooms, or other foreign objects. protruding from the body Leaning against the feet of the last victim who was strangled on January 4, 1964, stood cheerfully writing a greeting card that read: “Happy New Year!”
when there is no forced entry The so-called Boston Strangler terrorized one city and captivated the nation. Including my grandfather Gerold Frank, a writer and journalist who traveled to Boston and became the only writer lurking in the capitol that oversees the largest area in America. hunted until now His best-selling book is about the hunt. Boston StrangerIt was adapted into a film in 1968 starring Tony Curtis and Henry Fonda, which provoked the true crime shack industry with great force.
On March 17, Hulu released the latest addition to its portfolio as well. Boston Stranglerstarring Kiara Knightley and Carrie Koon as two pioneering journalists destroys stories and paves the pavement until the truth is revealed and a measure of justice is achieved.
Gerold interviewed every key figure in the investigation over the course of three years. Including journalist Loretta McLaughlin, Keira Knightley’s character and his front-row seat in history tell a different story than what hits the screens this week.
The Hulu movie is written and directed by Matt Ruskin (Crown Heights) plays McLaughlin as a lonely, desperate seeker of truth. They are mainly men who are more interested in power and gain than learning the truth or obtaining justice. McLaughlin and her colleague Jean Cole (played by Coon) must pressure investigators to do their job. They have identified the prime suspect. It was a handyman named Albert DeSalvo, whom the police considered incompetent. Thought to have been imprisoned during a killing spree and unlikely to be the culprit. It was because of the stubbornness of women that the state took control of the men’s hunt, or the men ultimately responsible for besieging women in Boston.
In the second half of the movie Almost brought the investigation to life alone. McLaughlin begins to suspect a single murderer. The witness identified it as not DeSalvo, but his cellmate, George Nassar, who was at the scene. And a conspiracy theory emerges: a study of news reports with details of the crime. DeSalvo pleaded guilty to a bounty for solving the crime, with investigators consulting the murder details eager to close the case. DeSalvo’s lawyer F. Lee Bailey, the notorious O.J. The confession went out of court, along with a written agreement that would pay DeSalvo large sums (and huge attorney fees) and police and government officials. which was protected from scrutiny by male newspaper editors. Declare victory against a city desperate to move on. Celebrating the glory of saving the women of Boston from terror.
“You all make legends,” Nassar told McLaughlin. Which eventually got the tape, in which the film confirms that the confession was taught. People want to believe it’s DeSalvo, he explains, because the alternative is too annoying—there’s a lot of DeSalvo out there, “and your safe little world is just an illusion.” in the headline to state the new consensus that there are several “Boston Stranglers”.
The content of the film is clear. As McLaughlin said, “No one cares to find out the truth. And people get away with murder.” In particular, men seek political, personal and financial interests before concerns about women’s views or safety.
The problem is, the real McLaughlin never believed in the conspiracy the film portrayed. Especially the view that there are many killers. (The film says “Inspired by” real events Although the previous script says “Based on a true story,” and the press still calls it that way.) In 1965, during the hunt, She told my grandfather, It defies the logic that there will be many psychopaths running around Boston, strangling women and organizing crime in similar and bizarre ways. She reiterated her belief in a single murderer in a 1992 op-ed and said in a 2005 interview regarding the 13 murders, “I believe the killer is Albert DeSalvo, no doubt.”
The timeline of the film is compressed. It’s a reasonable surrender to the demands of the movie. But it diminishes the assumption of the main storyline. In fact, McLaughlin had left the paper when DeSalvo became a suspected Strangler. In fact, DeSalvo wasn’t named a Strangler until 1966, when my grandfather printed the link in his book. (He was the only person released by DeSalvo for him to do so. What is known as the book deal that F. Lee Bailey offered DeSalvo) for nearly three years after the strangulation ended was not McLaughlin, but reportedly a detective who realized that DeSalvo got out of prison during the murder and was a suspect. doubt it works In other words, she didn’t solve the case.
McLaughlin’s true story is already amazing. She is a fearless journalist and profoundly compassionate. The newsroom barrier breakers are usually all-male, referring to women who cross the threshold as “the men.” She convinces male editors to let her investigate a series of murders that many don’t even notice or see as stories about “Nobody,” and she plays a key role in pushing the investigation forward. (She died in 2018)
Why does the movie have to turn her into a conspiracy theorist? and credits her with abilities that are not hers. And it doesn’t have to be so for her to be a great heroine.
The movie looks fun. Especially in the second half When routine procedures turn into conspiracy thrillers and in fact The reality of this case is The multiple killer theories concealed by massive concealers have been with us since the strangulation began. Not without reason, DeSalvo was never tried for murder. Mostly because Bailey hid his confession from being accepted. He was stabbed in jail in 1973, shortly after hinting in a letter that his confession might have been false. Which, naturally, further fueled the conspiracy that DeSalvo wasn’t the murderer and was part of a cover-up.
Although DeSalvo was never found guilty of murder, But the evidence was overwhelming that he was the Strangler. References to many crime details that no one can ever know. (Many people focus on the details of their mistakes. But he is believed to have raped hundreds of women in their homes. And what surprised the investigator was that he did not remember much. But how much did he do?) Several witnesses placed him at murder scene And in developments in 2013 that should ease doubts. New DNA evidence, made possible by advances in testing technology, finally confirmed the link between DeSalvo and the final victim. Their family has been keen to question whether DeSalvo was responsible. The best evidence we have points to DeSalvo.
Why do conspiracy theories persist? So the evidence and logic are condemned?
The standard sociological interpretation of the conspiracy appeal is to provide clean, simple answers, and a sense of control and moral righteousness in a stratified, complex, and uncertain world. analyze this McLaughlin’s movie version is a composite puppet. A sponge for an imaginary male accomplice if #MeToo bodies are bent. (who is interested in getting the truth) and bad guys. It then uses her as a vehicle to uncover a sneaky Oliver Stone-style conspiracy theory with shadow cover at its core.
But the real truth is what Nassar says in the film. More worryingly, there are many DeSalvos, as evidenced by the growing number of shootings. mental health crisis and the absurdity of the violence that increasingly enters our sphere of life. The film invites us to immerse ourselves in a grand story of safety, courage and redemption, but as the screen goes dark We have to think realistically: we live in a violent, messy time with no easy answers. or refuge And there is a constant need to find out the truth. Whether that truth entertains, comforts, or disturbs us.
(Tag to translate)Keira Knightley
Source link
